P�l, So now you have me curious. Perhaps you're right. There is no real rush right now. I still need to do some building of my 67 stuff first. I will be very interested in what they are going to show.
Thanks for the tip! Bruce Dayton Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 12:46:24 AM, you wrote: PAJ> You should wait out the next Limited lens. It may simplify things and I'm PAJ> certain it will make you happy.... PAJ> P�l PAJ> Bruce: >>The 43 is nice. The build quality is better than my FA 50/1.7 and >>optically is seems (wishfull thinking?) slightly better. Here is one of my >>shots with it: http://pug.komkon.org/01jan/bkdPUG0101.html . I like the >>slightly wider angle better than the 50 but it is getting close to my 35. >>Since I have the 67 I am looking for a smaller, lighter 35mm (fewer lenses >>- but still high optical quality) and the Limited set seems pretty good. >>Of course I already have the FA 85 and FA 35 which would mean selling at a >>loss. For a little more size/weight I could go with FA 24, FA 35, FA 50, >>FA 85, FA 100 Macro and FA 200 or sell some things and go FA 24, 31 >>Limited (new), 43 Limited, 77 Limited (New), FA 100 Macro and FA 200. The >>second kit would mean selling the 28, 35, 50 and 85 and buying the 31 and >>77. The first kit would only mean selling the 43. Seems like I lose alot >>more money the second way. PAJ> - PAJ> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, PAJ> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to PAJ> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
