Based on the pixel peeping and considering the price differential I
would buy a K-5II or IIs solely if they showed an appreciable
improvement in AF under low light as compared with an original K-5.
Practically I feel that there is no other advantage in moving from the
K-5 but that just me ;)

On 12 November 2012 02:13, Miserere <miser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can see clear differences between the K-5, K-5II and K-5IIs in both
> noise management and detail preservation/resolution.
>
> But "clear" doesn't necessarily mean "large" or "useful on a practical
> basis". That said, based on pixel-peeping, I'd choose the K-5IIs.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>    —M.
>
>     \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
>
>     http://EnticingTheLight.com
>     A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
>
>
>
> On 10 November 2012 07:16, Rob Studdert <distudio.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I can see a marked difference if I select a D800 as one of the cameras
>> under compare otherwise the differences between the K5 variants are
>> academic at best IMO.
>>
>>
>> On 10 November 2012 22:04, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The resolution advantage is there in plain view. Focus on any fine
>>> text. Eg: examine the red square area below the globe, with the poem.
>>> Try it at ISO 100 first then switch back to 6400. The K-5IIs degrades
>>> the least of al the samples.
>>>
>>> I added the Canon 5DMkII in to the samples and was interested to note
>>> that the K-5IIs actually beats it for fine rez, and looks cleaner at
>>> 6400 ISO.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Rob Studdert <distudio.p...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> I sure as hell can't see any glaring advantage to the K-5 IIs, nor do
>>>> I see any significant issue in red saturated areas of the test image.
>>>> However what remains impressive is how little image quality
>>>> degradation there is switching from ISO80 to ISO 800 ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 November 2012 14:53, Tim Bray <tb...@textuality.com> wrote:
>>>>> DPR has samples so you can do close-in comparison... here are the K-5,
>>>>> the K-5 II, and K-5 IIs doing ISO6400 RAW.
>>>>>
>>>>> The IIs may have big advantages, but they're sure not on display here.
>>>>> Zero in on anything that has intense red saturation; I was surprised
>>>>> by what I saw.
>>>>>
>>>>> Having said that, I totally disapprove of pixel-peeping.  Anyhow,
>>>>> that's my story and I’m sticking to it. -T
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
>>>> Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
>>>> Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -bmw
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
>> Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
>> Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to