Walt, get a lens hood for the ones you want to increase contrast with. Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Walt <ldott...@gmail.com> wrote: > So far, it seems to be sharper than the 50 f/2 I got in the same lot -- > though, it's highly possible that's a consequence of user error. > > From what I gather, the coatings on these lenses aren't all that good. I > just wonder if bumping the in-body saturation a bit on them would be the way > to go, or just wait to bump it up in LR. > > -- Walt > > > On 11/15/2012 11:01 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: >> >> Normal lenses are the most likely lenses to be high quality optically, >> even in bargain brands, 135mm is probably the next most likely. It was hard >> to find a really bad one, and since they went out of favor you can find some >> real bargains. >> >> On 11/14/2012 5:17 PM, Walt wrote: >>> >>> Idunno -- seems sharp enough to me. >>> >>> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/8186573674/ >>> K20D, f/6.7, 1/640 sec, ISO 500 >>> >>> Had to bump up the contrast just a smidge, but all in all, not too >>> shabby. I'd say it's worth the $50 I spent on the entire lot of lenses. >>> >>> -- Walt >>> >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
