Well, this is all very interesting.
I edited the .lcp file for the Sigma 18-250, no effect. I then moved the
file to Appdata\adobe\cameraraw tree, and I saw that the new lens_id exists
in the index.dat file.
I then deleted all Lens profiles from the lightroom resources directory, ran
the import again. The index.dat file in Appdata\...\cameraraw reflect the
much shorter list of lenses (only the one in AppData\Adobe\CameraRaw) .
Tried import again, no lens id. However my Tamron 18-250 in a test photo is
still recognized in spite of not having a lens profile!!????
LR clearly is using 2 or more ways to detect the lens type, the .lcp files
are the only one I can find.

I tried using the import using Copy as DNG and as Add, no difference.
 
I have in the meantime set an Import preset to apply the Lens correction and
thus at least I get the benefit there. But I can't search on that lens in
Library.

If anyone has any ideas on how to get LR4.2 to see my Sigma on Import, help!
:-)

I will of course try asking on the Adobe fourm as well but given the  number
of ppl there who think that the text of the lens name is in the DNG file
(from the camera) I am not too hopeful.

Gerrit

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerrit Visser [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: December 1, 2012 9:44 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Lightroom vs Sigma 18-250 question

Hi Peter
THANK YOU.
I was only looking at the .lcp files in the Sigma/Pentax folder so didn't
realize there should be that field present there.

I did some quick testing by adding the field but no luck. This includes
deleting the index.dat file in camera raw directory to force a rebuild, the
lensid "8 8" is now there but on import the lens is still unknown.
Have to go out for a while and will return to this later.

Thank you for this most useful hint.

Gerrit

-----Original Message-----
From: PDML [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Loveday
Sent: December 1, 2012 7:53 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom vs Sigma 18-250 question

The LCP files do indeed contain the ID, at least for the Pentax lenses.

It is absent from some (all?) Sigma ones.  I recall there are some
conflicting IDs with third party lenses, presumably due to Sigma's
unwillingness to actually licence anything?

Anyway,  If you look in, say, the Pentax DA 55 LCP file, you'll see:

<stCamera:LensID>8 226</stCamera:LensID>

So I guess one could put the same (but I suppose 8 8) in the appropriate
sigma file.  Seems like you need to put it in every entry in the correction
table.

I have no idea if this will make it use this ID to identify the lens, mind
you.

- Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Walker
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 6:57 AM
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
Subject: Lightroom vs Sigma 18-250 question

Posting for a K-5 -toting friend (Gerrit Visser) who just got Lightroom for
Windows.

Gerrit asks ...

"The puzzle is why the Sigma 18-250 shows as Unknown lens in
Library/metadata while it is listed ok in Develop. The lens id is 8 8 which
is in the exif, exiftools displays the correct lens etc.

Has anyone figured out where LR/Camera Raw keeps it mapping tables?
The .lcp files do not contain any information regarding the lens id, only
corrections. As an added twist, the release notes have the word Macro in the
Sigma lens name, while it appears nowhere else."

--
-bmw

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2629/5427 - Release Date: 11/29/12 


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to