> From: William Robb <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> > > On 13/12/2012 11:57 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: >> And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D. >> >> > How is it obsolete? I don't think they stop working when another camera > comes out, and when the 645D was introduced, it was rather a game changer. > I have spent some time with the 645D. It will take more than a 36mp > small format camera to make the 645D obsolete. > But, one would have to use both to know this. > I have. > Have you?
Not intending to butt heads with you Bill. It's obviously not obsolete, but it loses a degree of relevance. If one can arguably get a camera that's quite close in resolution and other performance factors, with a huge lens catalog to choose from. for about 1/3 the price... I looked yesterday and cannot remember the figures, but the DxO scores were fairly close between the aforementioned bodies (one troll to another). Tom C, -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
