Stan, Thanks for the insight. I was most definitely interested in the 200. I have to go back and see what it is exactly. I thought I was paying attention when writing it down, but like a kid in a candy store I was a bit excited with all the Pentax glass in front of me.
Anyway, it is not an A* for I think that I would most definitely have keyed in on that. So it must be a K. I don't mind K lenses. I use the lenses based on glass not features. I have been known to toss a Tele-Takumar on an MZ-S. Thanks again for your help, Cesar -----Original Message----- From: Stan Halpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: A little help from the group. Cesar - I have personal experience with only the 40/2.8 and the 300/4. But based on what I've read and a quick scan of some comments in my web site, I think that the 200/2.5 is the best lens of the bunch. Said to be very good optically but heavy. I also think that they are all overpriced (except maybe the 200/2.5). I sold my 300/4 for much less than $484, I wouldn't go as low as $125 for my 40/2.8, but I would be embarassed to ask for as much as $299. $150-175 would probably be about right, even at that maybe a bit high. You said A-200/2.5. Don't think so. There is a K 200/2.5 and an A* 200/2.8. The later in excellent condition is on KEH now for $850. I guess I would evaluate the K 200/2.5 depending on if you want a K lens and how beat up it is. Stan > From: "Matamoros, Cesar A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:40:43 -0500 > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: A little help from the group. > > I have made it to Tucson. What does it say about me that I have hit > about five camera stores already? I have limited Internet access at the > moment and as such cannot look through the archives and other sources. > Therefore I am hoping to hear from the collective group. > > I have located an A-200/2.5 in bargain condition for $380. How is > this lens? Is the price reasonable? > > They also have a 300/4 for $484. I already have an A* so I am not > interested, but am wondering how their pricing is. The lens is in VG > condition. > > I handled a 40/2.8 for the first time. Talk about small. It is in > Exc- condition and they are asking $299!!! > > Finally, they have an A 35-70/3.5-4.5 for $96. It is in VG > condition. What are the thoughts on this lens? I have shied away from > zooms, but I recall this lens being discussed on this list and I have to > admit that I did not really pay attention. > > This place has a few screwmount lenses, but mainly in the 50-55mm > range. I will be going back to see what they else they have after looking > at my inventory to refresh my memory. > > I located two places that repairs cameras. Another has quite a few > bodies from a screwmount to a couple of black body M series, one being an > ME. I have enough bodies and am not even going to ask to handle these. > > > Thanks a million for all your help, > > César > Panama City, Florida > in Tucson, Arizona - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .