From: "P. J. Alling" <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> > Bored, clicked a link, read a paragraph, almost threw up. Cruising the > internet, randomly, risking > my sanity, so you don't have to.
One incurs no pain when they risk what they do not possess. ;) Tom C. pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: >Send PDML mailing list submissions to > pdml@pdml.net > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > pdml-requ...@pdml.net > >You can reach the person managing the list at > pdml-ow...@pdml.net > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of PDML digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: X-Pro 1, eh? (Steve Cottrell) > 2. Re: Tethered shooting problems (Jens) > 3. Re: PESO - Still Smiling (bike messenger content) (Igor Roshchin) > 4. Re: A logistics problem (Larry Colen) > 5. Re: Tethered shooting problems (P. J. Alling) > 6. Re: PESO: Giglio (Daniel J. Matyola) > 7. Re: OT Publishing thoughts (Bob Sullivan) > 8. Re: ot browsers (Daniel J. Matyola) > 9. Re: Tethered shooting problems (P. J. Alling) > 10. Re: PESO - Still Smiling (bike messenger content) > (Daniel J. Matyola) > 11. Kennyboy is still an idiot. (P. J. Alling) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:42:03 +0000 >From: "Steve Cottrell" <co...@seeingeye.tv> >To: "pentax list" <PDML@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: X-Pro 1, eh? >Message-ID: <20130113184203.2144009...@newsmtp.blacknight.co.uk> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >On 13/1/13, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>I almost think I am in the market for a small but good quality digital > >>camera, and am really attracted to the Fuji cameras right now. >>I know a few here are using various models. >>Here is my criteria: >>Must have an optica viewfinder (a hybrid is OK, as long as there is an > >>optical option). >>Interchangable lenses would be nice, in which case a good selection of > >>primes would be a requirement, though if it is a fixed lens, it would >need >>to be a medium wide to medium telephoto zoom. >>Obviously, it must shoot in some sort of raw format. >>Video not important, but if it's there, fine. >>Good high ISO capability. The K5 has spoiled me for being able to >shoot high >>ISO, and there is no way I want to go back to being afraid to shoot >above >>ISO 400. >> >>Thanks for any advice. > >Without a doubt the X-Pro 1 sounds like it fits the bill. I have the >Baby X10 the build quality and pictures out of it are amazingly good. >The X20 is supposed to be streets ahead because of a new sensor, and >even has optical viewfinder with info overlay. > >I don't want interchangeable lenses anymore, just don't do that kind of >shooting. At some point I will be getting an X100s without a doubt. I >may even sell the X10 and get an X20 - the 2 cameras together will >satisfy my picture taking needs. > >My biggest question is why I am not considering anything from Pentax >:-( > >Oh well. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
