I found factory calibration good enough.
I'm using two U2410, one at home and other at work.
Both running on Linux. I should try to play with color profiles some
time... maybe.
This model is rather old, but still the best in this price range. Aspect
ratio and input sources, etc etc...
Gasha
On 04/23/2013 07:43 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Depending on how accurate their profile is, the spyder may not create
a better profile. The spyder2 is a bit older than current
spectrometers. You can create profile with the spyder and try it.
Sometimes I've even had better results just tweaking by hand and
looking at some charts on the monitor. I always feel calibrating with
a tool is probably the best way to go because you have control over
the results. At least if you use good color management system
software. Most monitors cover sRGB fairly well but struggle with Adobe
RGB. The monitor was probably designed for sRGB since it is mostly
standard, so I would stick with that.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Boris Liberman<bori...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
My old (like 10 years old) Philips monitor finally expired. To that end (or
should I say - to its demise :-) ) I bought a new screen. It is Dell U2410.
It has pre-calibrated Adobe RGB and sRGB profiles and even comes with its
own (specific to this sample) color calibration factory report.
My question is then: do I re-apply Spyder2? or do I just use one of the
profiles? If not Spyder2 - then which profile - Adobe RGB or sRGB?
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
