That would dilute the brand. Apparently they are not a tax burden. We are assured that they bring in more than they cost.
That, of course, does not justify their continued existence as an institution. B On 22 May 2013, at 14:40, "Daniel J. Matyola" <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was joking, of course. > > On second thought, it might reduce the tax burden if the royal family > did endorsements. Kind of like the way colleges and sports teams sell > the name of their sports areas to the highest bidder. > Dan Matyola > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:24 AM, David Mann <dmann...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 22, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This is where I found the Prince of Wales' coat of arms: >>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17352572 >>> >>> Does he get paid for endorsing whisky? >> >> No, that would be improper. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Warrant_of_Appointment_(United_Kingdom) >> >> Cheers, >> Dave >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
