On 6/22/2013 3:47 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
There is indeed an M28/2.8 Type II lens.
The aperture and glass is the same as the A28/2.8, but no A setting.
That's a well known variation and desirably sharper than the M28/2.8.
I've never hears of an M50/1.4 version A variation.
Regards, Bob the collector...
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
There is an odd "type 2" M28 that appears to be an A lens in all
respects, except lacking the "A" setting and connections which gives
even more evidence of being made in a "transitional" period, so I
would guess that your original "transitional" theory is likely the
correct one. It would be interesting to know the serial number and see
how far off it is from the earliest A lenses.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:21 AM, P.J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:
I've been told that by competent repair people, more's the pity.
On 6/22/2013 7:31 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Who is to say that all the parts are original?
"A" glass does not fit the "M" package. The glass carrier system is
entirely different.
--
There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive
failure, and those that will.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
"Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" -
Peter Galassi
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
all the M50mmf1.4 I have owned have had a bluish tint to the coatings.
To get amber you have to go back to the super-takumar version of the
50mmF1.4
--
J.C. O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
--
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
