On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:26:57PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote: > Well, no, Tom, the situations aren't at all parallel. > > I'm very, very happy to be using MRIs and PET/CTs. I'm also very happy to be > using a K-5 instead of an istD or Super Program. > > The technology has its place, though. I don't get an MRI on every patient > with a tummyache, just because it's available. I don't need a 24MP FF camera > to do the kind of photography I do.
Are you promoting the heretical view that not every photographer needs the ultimate performance in every category, for every photo that they take? Jeez, next thing you'll be saying is that one size does not fit all, and even worse, that there is no such thing as a perfect camera, because the things that would make it better for one application could make it worse for another application. I do hope however, that once pixel spacing gets below about 450nm the race for higher resolution will taper off. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
