Works either side of the pond! On 23 Jul 2013, at 03:23, John <johnsess...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Beat off" doesn't have quite the same meaning in the U.S. > > On 7/22/2013 4:25 PM, Bob W wrote: >> The difference between a Rolex and a Timex is that you can beat off >> potential muggers with a Rolex and you won't damage the watch, >> whereas with a Timex no-one wants to mug you. >> >> B >> >> On 22 Jul 2013, at 21:02, <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote: >> >>> So its a status lens? >>> >>> I mean a Rolex still tells time like a Casio or Timex, so its >>> mainly a status thing, but can the 1.8 be that much better than a >>> 2.8? >>> >>> Reminds me of when I was searching for stereo components many moons >>> ago for $XXXX I could get a very good sounding system but for many >>> times that amount I could get a highly recommended system that I >>> honestly couldn't hear the difference in sound quality. >>> >>> >>> Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Addy" >>> <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: KEH has an A* 135mm f1.8 >>> >>> >>>> Similar discussion for Rolex vs Timex. Mostly similar reasons >>>> for owning both the Rolex and the A* 135mm f1.8. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Bill >>>> <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 22/07/2013 12:38 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Can it really be worth $2569 ? >>>>> Save yourself $2400.00 and go for the f/2.8. >>>>> >>>>> bill > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
