On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:20:05AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote: > > You still haven't answered the implied question: are you being literal or > figurative? The only way you could be literally accurate is if there is > something wrong, there's just no way for an upgraded Firefox to be a > hundred times slower otherwise. (I don't care how old your computer is, > that's essentially irrelevant.)
Unless, of course, you run out of physical memory, and start thrashing. Needing more memory than the machine currently has available can easily cause a particular program to run a hundred times slower. The older a machine is, the less memory is likely to have been configured on it (memory gets significantly cheaper every year). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
