On Aug 12, 2013, at 7:46 AM, steve harley <p...@paper-ape.com> wrote:
> a few years ago i contracted at a large corpse where another department (on > which my department relied for file services) managed to obliterate a RAID > array ("RAID is safe, right?") and in the process discovered their (untested) > backups were also faulty … heads rolled; the situation i had been brought in > to clean up (i am a software janitor) was even more tenuous, but from the > start i had advocated protective measures, so i was made to seem very wise I know a guy who used to work at Telecom. He once told me about a telephone exchange that crapped itself and lost its data, so they went to restore from backup. The trouble is, they'd had a software update a couple of years previously that had a bug which caused it to write corrupt data to the backup. So they had to re-enter everything from paper records. > quite recently i took a retainer for improving a website and said one of the > first things i needed to do was confirm the site was properly backed up; i > soon got word from the previous contractor that he didn't think the backups > were working; the clients, while failing to give me any way to check the > backups, and thus making it impossible to set up a staging server, > nonetheless insisted i rush a major reconfiguration of the site; when the > clients clearly didn't understood nor accept the liability of this approach, > i told them it wasn't going to work and said goodbye Very wise move. You have a good CYA plan :) Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.