They're all trying to look like Facebook.
Problem is, if I wanted something that looks like Facebook why wouldn't
I just go to Facebook. I think they're missing something obvious here.
On 8/28/2013 11:23 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I agree about flickr - and now smugmug has decided to go that route too
for their "new improved" look - if one choses it.
But I was able to view the pics one at a time - I jsut think it is ugly
how indexes are presented. should call them fistnails instead of
thumbnails
ann
On 8/28/2013 10:34, Bill wrote:
On 28/08/2013 7:53 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
This is a derail, but I'm guessing that Bill is using an ancient
version of Microsoft's Internet Explorer, something that doesn't
handle CSS code well.
Chrome actually. Look it's no big deal. Every time I try to look at
something posted to flickr, it's the same suck ass interface. They are
trying to be cute and hip, and it gets in the way of the images, which
means they are working against what they are trying to do. I can't cure
stupid and it's not that big a loss for me, there are lots of pictures
on the web, most of them are presented in such a way as to not be
annoying.
flickr isn't one of those places is all.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.