Thanks. I was just curious about them. The comments on R Monagha's site are positive abuot the original rollei (zeiss) mutars, somewhat pos about the tele for Y and somewhat neg about the wide for Y.
BTW, I have seen several Rollefielxes (I have and used some older ones, prewar) but Yashicas are clearly better in their focusing screen. Yes, Planar is better than Tessar design by many degrees, but so is the price. If I bought a Rollei (a 2.8 Planar tempts me, in such a small box. Although I love the early, smaller Standard Rolleiflex '35), I would have the screen changed to a beattie/microprism. The original screen really "sucks" (sorry Wendy, but it's been long time somebody used this word <g>). Why did Franke und Heidecke they put such stupid screen on otherwise great camera ?!? Frantisek - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
