Epson printers seem fine (I’m printing to two of them) and both my HP printers 
seem fine too. Epson Scan … Never use it, never installed it; always use 
VueScan here. 

G

On Oct 25, 2013, at 6:52 AM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:

> Why is Epson software always a problem with every new OS? That clinches it 
> for me: No Maverick in my immediate future. I rely heavily on the Epson scan 
> software (Vuescan is awful and clunky), and I'd be in deep doo-doo if my 
> Epson printer balked.
> 
> Paul
> On Oct 25, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Charles Robinson <charl...@visi.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Oct 24, 2013, at 20:26 , Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Has anyone upgraded their Mac to Maverick? Any glitches. It's supposed to 
>>> speed some things up and has some nice new features. But I'm a little 
>>> nervous about diving right in on this one. Sounds like a significant change.
>>> 
>> 
>> I've been running it for a couple of weeks now.  There are only two issues 
>> I've got.
>> 
>> 1. My Epson scanner software reports "You can't use this version of the 
>> application 'Epson Scan' with this version of OSX".  So I'll need an update 
>> somehow.  Maybe Epson will provide one?  Hope so.
>> 
>> 2. I have a DNS "search domain" issue.  It's odd.  The domain at our company 
>> is visi.com - so if I want an address of a host here, I can type:
>> 
>> host syslog.mn2
>> 
>> and it will report:
>> 
>> syslog.mn2.visi.com has address 209.98.102.2
>> 
>> But if I then type:
>> 
>> ssh syslog.mn2
>> 
>> It doesn't work.  Instead I get this:
>> 
>> ssh: Could not resolve hostname syslog.mn2: nodename nor servname provided, 
>> or not known
>> 
>> So that's kind of a bug - but not a killer!
>> 
>> 
>> Other than those two issues, it seems nice.  The upgrade was smooth and 
>> painless and took less than 1/2 an hour.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to