The quote that is best from this review of the DF: "We're not entirely convinced this will offer a fast and fluid shooting experience with the camera to your eye"
And this is where Pentax has room to surpass Nikon in the retro-design. Imagine a camera that captures the looks of the original MX or LX, but has the eye-to-the-viewfinder functionality of the pZ-1p. It would also be cool if it provided a split-prism center screen (to work well, out of the box, with MF lenses) and yet not sacrifice AF. That would be a coup. If Pentax's full frame does not sacrifice all video capabilities, I think that would be a win for sales. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Steve Cottrell <co...@seeingeye.tv> wrote: > <http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikon-df> > > Interesting point - supports use of very old lenses. Mind you, would > have been stupid not to. > > Ricoh: how about a LX-D please :-) > > (anyone who thinks I'm living in the past, award yourself one star) > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, > || (O) | Web Video Production > ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> > _____________________________ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.