Have you considered m4/3? Much better IQ than Q and not much heavier IMO. You are already possibly willing to forgo a viewfinder, so why not a pen or something?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Thomas Bohn <thb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since I want to sell most of my equipment I'm starting to think if an > DSLR is really the right fit for me. > > K-50/500 has the advantage that I can still use my old nice 35mm lens > and do photos like the last five years w/o much change. But it is as > bulky as before and I won't just take it with me. > > The Q7 would be smaller, much smaller, I could just take it with > wherever I go and it had interchangeable lenses so it would really > like an DLSR but much more compact. > > The MX-1 would be compact and has really nice design, no > interchangeable lenses but a tilling back display. > > All three can produce DNG files, all three will make nice photos I can > put on the web, all three will really fit my needs. The only one who > would like a bigger camera might be my big hands. > > Thomas > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
