On 19/11/2013 4:24 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I grew to dislike the K-7. Hard to deal with the noise, even at ISO
400. Tonality was never a problem for me with the K-5. I usually
tweak the image to display the pallet I want anyway. I didn't do a
lot of studio shooting with the K-5, but I did do one major job,
shooting about a dozen portraits each of a dozen consulting firm
execs. I was surprised to see that I missed focus on four or five of
the approximate 150 frames. It seemed inexplicable, but I attributed
it to simple incompetence -- which may well have been the case.
The K7 was well nigh unusable above 400, but at base was as good as
anything out there. I was never fond of the coolness of the K5 files,
when I tweaked them to get a flesh tone I liked, something else was
wrong. The colour of the K3 seems closer to the rendering of the K7,
which pleases me greatly.
Your focus problem was likely the same problem my K5 had, just not as
severe.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
