Thanks Rick, the Rube Goldberg machine did not look good raw it needed
some contrast & sharpening to bring out the good stuff. I may give the
28mm another try.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:58:18 -0500
From: Rick Womer<rwomer1...@yahoo.com>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<pdml@pdml.net>
Subject: Re: complex & simple
Message-ID:<68a4c334-ec21-49ed-abf6-6e14d7064...@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Don, I really like both of these. The rendering of the machinery pic is
particularly nice.
Rick
On Dec 6, 2013, at 12:55 , Don Guthrie wrote:
>My contribution to the photo parade,however inadequate.
>
>The complex was shot while I was testing out an old M 28/2.8; the simple with 50mm
1.8. I just think they belong together somehow. C&C as always.
>
>Sorry I only have a flicker link.
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/valdon/11238131745/in/set-72157638411797785/
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
