Might depend on which Sigma 10-20 you had. There are two versions. I
think the f/4-f/5.6 version is supposed to be a (teeny-tiny) little bit
sharper than the constant aperture f/3.5 version.
On 12/7/2013 10:32 AM, Jos from Holland wrote:
Hm, maybe I had a bad copy, but my Sigma 10-20 gave me so many "just
not sharp" pictures. Now I have the 8-16mm, and it is so nice, sharp,
and 8mm is so much more than 10mm when looking for extremes...
Greetz, Jos
On 7-12-2013 16:24, Rob Studdert wrote:
The edges aren't that bad on the Sigma 10-20/3.5, they are better
than the Sigma 14/2.8 and the old Pentax A15/3.5. At 10mm wide open
it's a soft right at the extremes but generally if it needs to be
used wide open then light is poor anyhow and the image doesn't
suffer for the lack of edge sharpness.
On 8 December 2013 01:14, Zos Xavius <zosxav...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not a big fan of the sigma WA zooms. The edges on the 10-20
aren't great IMO.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Rob Studdert
<distudio.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
It looks mildly interesting, unless you have a Sigma 10-20/3.5
which is no optical slouch, is less than a stop slower,
provides a more versatile focal length range, has HSM focus
which allows full manual override and is cheaper.
On 6 December 2013 16:13, Igor Roshchin <s...@komkon.org>
wrote:
A new fast wide-angle rectilinear lens will be available soon
for Pentax cameras: 10/2.8 from Samyang. Unfortunately, it
will have only manual focus. It's also relatively heavy... It
might of interest to some people here.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/12/06/samyang-announces-10mm-f2-8-manual-focus-wideangle-prime
Cheers,
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
