I'm ok with it. I'd hate for the prism hump to say Ricoh to be honest though. Pentax has too storied of a history to just toss the name aside. That would be rather foolish.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/02/2014 10:20 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 05/02/2014 8:49 AM, Zos Xavius wrote: >>>> >>>> All ricoh now....take from that what you willl... >>>> >>>> >>>> http://photorumors.com/2014/02/04/new-ricoh-wg-20-and-wg-4-compact-cameras-leaked-pentax-name-is-gone/#more-54296 >>>> >>> It's what Ricoh said was going to happen. DSLRs would be Pentax, compacts >>> would be Ricoh. >>> No surprises. >>> >>> bill >> >> >> If anybody had doubts, the clearance sales on WG-III at the end of the >> year was a strong indicator that there would be a new WG type camera. >> Very clever the way they are handling the transition. They keep the camera >> line (e.g., WG-1, WG-ii, WG-III, and now WG-4), while rebranding from Pentax >> to Ricoh. Maintain tradition in the midst of change. >> >> stan >> > Ricoh appears to know what they are doing. This is the first time in nearly > 30 years that Pentax seems to have their act together. > > bill > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
