I’ll further explore that question tomorrow.

stan

On Mar 26, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote:

> I'm more interested in the smaller aperatures at which it fails to focus. It 
> would be nice to be able to use it on my 600. I have both the A-1.4X-L & 
> A2.0X-L but of course I lose AF with those.
> 
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert" <distudio.p...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Because inquiring minds want to know (more on the 1.4x)
> 
> 
>> Thanks for the report Stan, it does look useful, but I will have to
>> sell a K5 body to afford it :(
>> 
>> 
>> On 21 March 2014 02:38, Stanley Halpin <s...@stans-photography.info> wrote:
>>> I just did a couple of focus "tests" with my two slowest lenses. I won't 
>>> post any results - I was just handholding on random twigs, turkeys, lawn 
>>> sculptures, trees, etc. The images would tell you nothing about sharpness. 
>>> All of the following using center-point focus, K-3.
>>> 
>>> 1. Sigma DG 150-500mm f5-6.3 APO HSM + Pentax 1.4x TC
>>>        With the Sigma at 150mm zoom (presumably f/5.0)
>>>                - Sigma AF OFF: nothing happens - no AF.
>>>                - Sigma AF ON: snappy AF, no searching or other bad behaviors
>>> 
>>>        With the Sigma at 500mm zoom (presumably f/6.3)
>>>                - Sigma AF ON: Quite a bit of searching on low contrast 
>>> targets (e.g., tree trunks.) Fairly quick "snap" to focus on a weed seed 
>>> head 20 feet away against a backdrop of the river ice 150 feet away. Quick 
>>> "snap" to focus on tree trunks across the river.
>>>                - Probably usable at 500mm/6.3 when tripod mounted, looking 
>>> at a stationary target with reasonably high contrast. Not sure I would try 
>>> to handhold this combination to pick out flying birds above. If nothing 
>>> else, the motor noise as it searched would get on my nerves.
>>> 
>>> 2. Pentax FA 28-105/4-5.6 PZ (the original model of this lens)
>>>        With the lens at 28mm (presumably f/4.0)
>>>                - Quick albeit noisy focus on pretty much everything I 
>>> looked at.
>>>                        (I had forgotten how noisy the AF is on non-SDM 
>>> lenses! It has been awhile.)
>>>        With the lens at 105mm (presumably f/5.6) [AV, dialed to "wide 
>>> open", f/8.0 indicated on the display]
>>>                - Same results. Quick lock in on whatever targets.
>>> 
>>> If anyone wants to try this on a different lens, let me know and I'll send 
>>> you my shipping address and return the results to you soonest. Or stop by 
>>> and play with it yourself.
>>> 
>>> I will have this with me on an upcoming trip to Sweden/Norway/Denmark and 
>>> any Pentaxians I encounter along the way are welcome to do a try out of the 
>>> 1.4x.
>>> 
>>> stan
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
>> Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
>> Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to