On Apr 27, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote: > It looks like you had some nice light but none of these work well for me. As > Bill suggest, they are lacking a strong center of interest. There is some > nice light apparent, especially in the first shot and the last. I also > struggle with the scale here - looks to be a pretty small waterfall, maybe a > foot or so high?
I think it’s a few feet high. Most of the shots in the set are to show a friend as a possible place to go take some photos when she’s in town. > > I don't know about the frothy foam in the latter images though - looks like > the kind of thing that is immensely appealing because of its motion but > doesn't work in still photos. (I've shot many images of grass waving in the > breeze, sand blowing down the beach, tress bending under the wind that have > come back with nothing…) Actually there wasn’t much motion in the bubbles, which is why they stuck around. If you look at the timestamps on the photos the patterns barely change over several minutes. I just rather liked the mandlebrotty paisleyish patterns that the bubbles made. They seem to be photos some people like and others don’t. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
