Yeah. I wasn't thinking of burning to that extent, but I do prefer it to the original.
Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Alpert" <ma...@alpert.com> To: "PDML" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 4:05:58 PM Subject: Re: PESO - Fence Rail Landscape Thanks to Chris, Jack, Ann and Dan for the comments. Since there seems to be a consensus forming about the crop, I tried a quick and dirty version (with Jack's suggestion to burn in the background for good measure): https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16429359/fence_rail2.jpg It's defintiely a different picture. - Marco On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > I agree with Chris, but would try burning the background to reduce the glare > that > detracts from the well rendered weathered railing. > > Jack > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Mitchell" <chris.mitch...@which.net> > To: "PDML" <pdml@pdml.net> > Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 3:33:50 AM > Subject: Re: PESO - Fence Rail Landscape > > Marco - the fence rail is excellent and super B&W rendering. To me, > the OOF trees, particularly the white areas are distracting. I just > wonder whether a letterbox crop with the rail on the third might > improve things? > > Chris > > On 3 June 2014 07:25, Marco Alpert <ma...@alpert.com> wrote: >> http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo14/peso15.html >> >> Not my usual thing, but sometimes something intriguing just presents itself. >> >> Comments, as always, welcomed. >> >> -Marco >> >> --------------- >> http://www.alpert.com/marco -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
