On Jun 12, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Tim Øsleby <maritim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Long time no see. I need help from the best Pentax crew. > > Subject line pretty much sums it up. > I know that 16 mm is wider than 20 mm, and that f:2,8 is faster than > f:4. I also know that smaller and lighter is smaller and lighter. > > I pretty much know the good and the bads of the 16-50. I've got one at > my desk, that has served me well for about 5 years, but alas not any > more. > I know little a about how the Ltd performs. > > So how do they compare int the IQ department? And what about AF speed? > My min complaint about the 16-50 was that it had trouble finding focus > when shooting fast moving music performers. Is the Ltd better at that? Have you had problems with the 16-50 being too big and heavy? Or not sharp enough? Having a 16-50, and surprised at how much I use it, I don’t feel any draw to the 20-40, there are many other more compelling holes in the capabilities of my lens collection. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
