I've found that I can shoot long sequences with the K5 or K5II using
45MB/s cards without a problem but the K3 becomes bogged down using
these cards so I had to buy new 95MB/s card in order to make use of
the added capability of the K3.


On 4 August 2014 13:27, P.J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As a K-5 user, the only place the K-5IIs would really be an upgrade would be
> in the area of auto focus.  Yes, auto focus on the K-5II cameras actually
> works, as opposed to frustrating the hell out of you.  The dynamic range,
> MP, high ISO capabilities are pretty much the same as the K-5. It has no AA
> filter so images are likely to be a bit sharper bit but, I'm not sure that
> it's worth the upgrade.
>
> The K-3 is by all accounts the K-5's better in everything except dynamic
> range where it falls just a bit short, and loses out just a bit on high ISO
> performance, but not by much.  Auto focus is supposed to be a bit better
> than the K-5IIs, but pretty still close, both it and the K-5IIs however bury
> the original K-5 in that area.  Oh yes and on paper at least you'll get
> about 1 more FPS with the K-3 over the K-5.
>
> The bottom line is that unless you're biggest issue with the K-5 is auto
> focus performance, I'm not sure that the K-5IIs would be that much of an
> upgrade.  The K-3 offers more granularity in selecting auto focus points,
> (27 vs 11), has almost, equal dynamic range and high ISO capabilities as the
> K-5 cameras and a much greater pixel count.
>
> Now the downside.  The larger pixel count is going to tax any computer
> you're using for image processing, unless you've got a lot of horse power to
> spare, oh and you'll definitely need more SD storage unless you already have
> two or three times what you think you need.  The K-3 is maybe 10% larger and
> 10% heavier, and has a much higher battery drain than the K-5/II/IIs
> cameras.
>
> With the larger file size of the K-3 you get a linear resolution increase of
> about 22%  What that boils down to is if you want to make a 300dpi print,
> the largest you can make with with the K-3 would be 13x20 vs the K-5, etc.,
> at 10 1/4 x 16 1/2, (those sizes in inches if you want centimeters you'll
> have to do your own conversion).
>
> I think that you can pick up a New K-5IIs for a little as ~$650. The K-3 is
> still selling for about $1,100 to $1,200 at reputable dealers.
>
> What would I do?  I don't know.  The K-5II I own is already capable of
> making more than acceptable prints at 240 dpi that are larger than I can
> print for myself, and much larger than I can display on any high resolution
> output device that I own, or am likely to, in the near future.  While the
> K-3 seems to be a great camera I have a hard time justifying it to myself.
> On the other hand while I love the K-5II it's just not that much of an
> upgrade over the K-5 unless you really need the superior auto focusing.
>
>
> On 8/3/2014 9:31 PM, Ralph Turner wrote:
>>
>> I have been a Pentax user for over 15 years and have accumulated a good
>> number of lenses and accessories.  Normally I an not perplexed about which
>> new Pentax digital body to buy, until now.
>>
>> My main use of Pentax gear is for travel photography - small and
>> lightweight lenses, reasonable sized bodies and accessories.  Currently I am
>> using a three
>> three year old K5 and I would like to buy either a new K5iis body or a new
>> K3.  I do not need the camera for sports or kids and grandkids, just for
>> travel.
>> So, looking at dynamic range, high ISO challenges, MP, and somewhat the
>> price -- what body do you recommend and why?
>>
>> Ralph Turner
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
> immortality through not dying.
> -- Woody Allen
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to