The reviews I've read put the auto focus speed of the K-3 and K-5II on
par, but the K-3 is more granular, due to the increased number of focus
points. I can only speak to the K-5II vs the K20D, and it's a
revelation, Pentax auto focus that generally works...
On 1/8/2015 5:04 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 8, 2015, at 12:35 , P.J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:
The "Discontinued" K-5IIs is back in stock at B&H Photo. Not as discontinued
as all that, since it's still a current model on the Ricoh Imaging US site. The price is
really nice though. Really nice.
Holy CRAP. Under $500?
I've heard over and over that the K-5II has improved autofocus over the K5.
How much better, can anyone say, is the K3 over the K-5II for focus speed?
Because, honestly, better autofocus speed (and certainty) is the only thing I'm
craving on my K5.
So I'd either jump up to a K-5II or a K-3, whichever is "most confident in AF",
if I were to upgrade at all. Anyone?
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
