Malcolm, while I understand what you meant, -- the photographers who are
"hooked" on a particular system and have invested in the glass, etc.
But that's only part of the picture.
Your conclusion is based on the assumption that there is no movement on
the DSLR market.
First of all, there are always newcomers, for whom it could be the 1st
DSLR (or the first FF DSLR).
Second, if it is a successful camera accompanied by a good set of lenses
("good" and "successful" include technical and financial aspects), then
some people might switch to "Pentax system" when considering transition
from the relatively crappy entry-level Canon APS DSLRs.[*]
... Or even from the entry-level Canon FF DSLRs and optics ... just
because a good quality would be more affordable with Pentax.
=====
[*] I haven't looked at the recent entry models of Canon DSLRs, but the
earlier Digital Rebels (as well as film Rebels) were so-so. They were so
mediocre that I stopped looking at them at anywhat serious contenders,
when I was choosing my second SLR (first advanced one), and again, when
considering a DSLR.
Igor
On 2/4/2015 2:35 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
The real problem with selling an FF camera when the competition has had them
on the camera store shelves for years, is who are they going to sell it to
in a large enough quantity to justify the expense? Everyone who really
needed an FF camera has already bought one.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
