I have one of each of them and except for the cosmetics they seem to very similar. The K 24mm has the edge as a tactile experience. I don't use the K very often because the A is much more convenient.

On 6/16/2015 10:03 PM, Mark C wrote:
Bojidar's site says that the K 24 f3.5 was made from 1975-77, with the 2.8 following from 1977-84. Interesting - looking at the optical formulas the K24 2.8 and A 24 2.8 appear to be identical.


On 6/16/2015 6:11 AM, J C OConnell wrote:
When Pentax switched over to bayonet mount lenses the first series of K mounts included the K24/3.5. It was later discontinued and replaced by the K24/2.8. Does anyone know the date this happened? Was it during the M era of lenses or before? (They never made a M series 24mm).
jco

On 6/14/2015 1:00 PM, J C OConnell wrote:
Welcome to the wonderful world of SMC Pentax K series lenses. Not only are they optically superb, they are mechanically excellent as well. Now you know why I have collected and use nearly the complete set of primes...
jco

On 6/13/2015 11:12 PM, Mark C wrote:
I bought a copy of this lens from B&H a few days ago, and it arrived yesterday afternoon. I really have to hand it to B&H - this copy is absolutely perfect / mint / like new condition. I bought it mostly to use reverse mounted for macro work - something that will get me more magnification than the DFA 50mm macro using the same extension. I made a few test shots today and I can only say I am *really* impressed with this lens. I fully expected to see some degree of chromatic aberration ( and was hoping it would be correctable) - but really, there is none. None. This may not hold up for all subjects, but in the tests I ran today it was amazing.

I am really feeling good in that the DFA 50mm macro has proven to be exceptional, and the K 24 f3.5 looks like it will be every bit as good. I tried a lot of lenses recently for high magnification work - M 50mm f4 macro, M 50mm f1.7, A 28mm f2.8, F 28mm f2.8, and XR Rikenon 28mm f2.8 and a few enlarger lenses (admittedly no first rate enlarger lenses). The F 28mm f2.8 was the only one that delivered acceptable results, but this K24 is clearly a cut above. Pentax should revive some the optical formulas in these cult classic lenses - add the latest coatings, AF and LTD lens build quality - call them the CC Limited Series.

I also should comment that I am very positively impressed with B&H's return process. I never had occasion to use their return service before, but they quickly processed the return on the AF 160 ringflash that did not work out. I replaced the flash with an AF360FGZ original model - so I will continue to use the flash setup that I have used for the last 10 years or so. The cost of the K 24 f3.5 consumed the rest of the refund, with a little left over.

Mark

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus








---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus




--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve 
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to