I would agree - OD + a little yellow for the sky. I did the color
picker thing and got much the same as you.
R - 112
G - 95
B - 48
On 10/15/2015 7:59 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
The sky is what I'd call olive drab, the moonis yellow ochre..
anyone else?
ann
On 10/15/2015 8:23 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
No, I see no
greenish cast! Hmmm?
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 15, 2015, at 3:57 PM, ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
Hmmm - thecolor on my monitor has a greenish cast..
ann
On 10/15/2015 4:44 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks much, Ann!!
I liked the overall tone from the beginning as I perceived it
accommodating a dusk sunset after glow.(?)
I just looked at the slide and for what it's worth, the
color "appears" to match the print.
J :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 15, 2015, at 1:21 PM, ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
Jack - that's terrific - I do remember the winding back with the
LX but never , as I recall, managed to make somethin glike this work.
I hvae one nit.. which is totally personal- thecolorcast overall -
except for the moon, which is pleasing at that color.. easy enough
to adjust with sliders in photoshop if you are soinclined...
wondering if the color is just what happened when you scanned for
the web.
Larry -
"the technology available at the time"?! never had an LX, huh?
ann
On 10/15/2015 3:58 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Excellent job,
***particularly with the technology available at the time.**
MARK!!
Jack Davis wrote:
This shot in Nov. 2002. LX with A*300mmf/2.8. Shot the moon (a
few times from our back patio) using a 1.4L Pentax T/C and
tobacco colored filter.
As many of you will remember. the LX would allow you to rewind
the film to a desired frame. I did so and went to Gray Lodge
Refuge the next day with designs on a flock of rising Snow Geese.
I removed the filter and T/C and fairly quickly rolled up on a
good flock of Snow Geese. As was usually the case, it took some
waiting 'til the signal went out to the geese to lift off. Their
calls as they take flight always give me chills.
I had reset the exposure to what I guessed would under expose the
scene a couple stops.
I went home with a hope of "maybe" having gotten what I'd gone
after.
I consider the background a happy accident.
I found that I'd failed to rewind the film quite enough, but
stuck with it realizing it would not work as an 8X12.
I was more than pleased with the exposures and came to a
reluctant appreciation of the 8X10.
Have sold a number to locals, one just recently, and keep a
couple largish copies on continuous display.
C&C?
Thanks!
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=986
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
