I can't see the difference between photographing someone with tattoos and 
someone wearing clothes that someone else has designed, or a street containing 
buildings and billboards, and tons of other shit that's copyright. Sounds to me 
like a lawyer trying to drum up some spurious business.

B

> On 31 Oct 2015, at 18:22, Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote:
> 
> Some interesting questions arise!
> http://improvephotography.com/35091/copyright-nightmare-taking-photos-of-people-with-tattoos/
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to