>Simply because the four biographers were not always in simultaneous >attendance. > >Besides, there are plenty of non-Biblical writings of the times to >corroborate the Gospels. > >Alan C
Let's not overstate our case. Knarf caught that. There are not many extra-biblical "writings" available. Josephus makes mention, but that from a distance. And we have only a couple of fragments from late first century NT documents. But there is a good number of artifacts. The "Pilate stone" is a fairly recent find and is the most significant extra-biblical evidence of him. That comes despite the Roman propensity to document everything. There are others as well. (The skeptical approach being that, without evidence, a thing should be questions. Lack of evidence is evidence of lack, so they say. This approach makes the mistake of applying empirical/inductive methods to the abductive nature of historical inquiry. ) The discussions around the James ossuary continue. It looks to be genuine, but the arguments from both sides appear inconclusive at this point. Even with the small amount of material there is still more on Jesus than on Aristotle & Plato, and many others. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.