> > 2016-02-18 16:28 GMT+02:00 Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com>: > >> Check it out: > >> http://petapixel.com/2016/02/16/real-estate-photo-illegal-false- > adver > >> tising/ I'm pretty sure that there's no Photoshop involved here: The > >> photographer just got very close with a wide angle lens and then > >> positioned the camera fairly low to the ground. (You can see from > >> other photos that the p[hotographer would have to have been *very* > >> close to the house to be on the lawn.)
Only just seen this. I thought that was standard agent photography. Plenty of dodgy pictures of property locally on a regular basis. Best thing I've seen UK wide though, was an isolated bungalow that seemed in a beautiful area - until a local journalist posted the full scene in the shadow of a nuclear reactor (Sizewell B?). Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
