And your conclusion is... ? To me, on a quick look, exposure doesn't seem to make a difference. I suspect I would see noise if I blew up the underexposed ones, of course.
Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: > At lunch I saw some flowers similar to the ones in the gamut/colorspace > thread and decided to do a silly experiment. I photographed the flowers, > bracketing the exposure. Then on my next errand to the post office I saw > some more flowers and shot some more bracketed exposure. > > Artistically, these photos are crap, the low shutter speed versions have > some nasty camera blur. However, they are posted in a flickr album in > shutter speed order from 1/8000 down to 1/40. All shot with a K-3, ISO 100, > f/16, Tamron 18-250 at 250mm. > > Some of them have my lens hood, which I used as a greycard, just as a > reference. The only processing is quick colorbalance and a quick and dirty > adjustment of exposure in post processing. > > http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157666819425355 > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
