I'm still on the search for a decent bag. The last time I bought a bag I really liked, was a gigantic Tamrac from a list member on the south coast of the UK (Brighton? Peter?) who I believe had a shop there and moved to Japan (is that right?) - this was many moons ago when a Pentax digital camera of any sort was just speculation. Great bag, I store my film cameras in it etc, but only useful otherwise day to day if you have some poor devil to cart it around for you. I have a backpack which I got as a free gift with a DSLR body that is too small, and another free bag which just takes a body and a 50mm lens attached.
Over the years from film, I've noticed that many bags have moved away from being able to house two camera bodies. I assume that because you now have variable ISO, manufactures don't feel you need to have two bodies, as you might once have done using different film. The thing is, what I want is a bag that is capable of housing two bodies with lenses attached and enough room for spare batteries and all the sundries of the digital age. Many of the places I take photos, especially in the Summer are dusty environments (horse stables for a start), and frankly, I don't want to be changing lenses on site. I normally have one body set up with the 16-85 & the other with a 55-300. What I am fed up doing, is carrying a bag which doesn't suit, and a shopping bag for the other camera. I don't really want a larger backpack, or a bag which screams that it contains camera equipment inside. I'm not sure there is anything out there that fits the job I want done. Any ideas? Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
