The reviews on B&H are very positive for both lenses, with lots of praise for the 28-105's sharpness.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: > > > Gonz wrote: >> >> Anybody have both of these lenses and compared them? The 24-70 is >> almost 3x the price of the 28-105 and besides the constant 2.8 >> aperture, is the image quality that much better? > > > I'm curious too. I got the 28-105 as an all weather daily driver lens. > Since I already had a tamron 28-75 (not weather sealed), and we've had dry > weather, I've hardly even had the 28-105 on my camera, as I find I need the > faster lens more often than I need weather sealing or a bit more reach. > > I will note that even if you don't already have a third party 28-75/2.8 you > can pick one (particularly a used one) and the 28-105 up for less than the > 24-70. > >> > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -- Reduce your Government Footprint -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
