That's a valid point. I'm not sure these have no redeeming value, although I don't like them
Paul via phone > On Aug 3, 2016, at 10:50 PM, ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > > Paul -I'm sure you must know I'm not opposed to post processing in general - > but I think this work is really quite awful. Post-processing for its own > sake. > > We are entering the digital imaging age equivalent to Keane portraitsand > tigers on black velvet, it seems to me. > > ann > > >> On 8/3/2016 10:31 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> Post processing isn't sad. It requires skill and artistry. I'm not wild >> about this grungy look, but I appreciate the creative process. >> >> Paul via phone >> >>> On Aug 3, 2016, at 10:22 PM, ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>> Sadly, John - there is a lot of post processing in these >>> >>> ann >>> >>> >>>> On 8/3/2016 3:33 PM, John wrote: >>>> It's street portraiture, and you don't do it in post. You set up or find >>>> "Rembrandt" type lighting before you make the photo. It also looks like >>>> she's shooting for fairly high contrast, low key lighting. >>>> >>>>> On 8/2/2016 4:33 PM, Gonz wrote: >>>>> I've seen several galleries like this, where they have a certain >>>>> "Rembrandt" like quality to them. How do they post process to get this? >>>>> >>>>> http://www.trendsandlife.com/artistic-photographs-homeless-people-facing-challenges-streets/ >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
