Hi, why not do a clip test and decide from that?
--- Bob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Saturday, May 11, 2002, 9:29:23 AM, you wrote: > Outrageously old rolls of exposed film pop up in our household > occasionally - found in a drawer or at the bottom of a closet. I have two > rolls found like this. One is a 24 exp FP4 that I processed normally in > Ilfosol for 6.5 mins at 1:9 and the negs were horribly thin. Shot by the > SO, judging form the look of our son in some images, at least 5 years > ago. Now, this could have been due to exposure errors, but before I > develop the next roll (details below), would there be any advantage of > pushing or pulling development to compensate for the effects of age on > exposed images? > The next roll is at least 6 years old!!!! The label on the cassette > indicates it's a roll of Jessop KB17 36 exp @ 100 ISO and was made in > Croatia. I would expect to treat it like FP4, but would there be any > advantage in cutting or increasing development time? Not concerned about > the contents (obviously!)... > Many thanks > Cotty > _______________________________________________________ > Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Check out the UK Macintosh ads > http://www.macads.co.uk > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
