On 17/12/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed: >Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the >niche of my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but >will still fit in my camera bag and not weigh a ton. >The da 55-300, despite nominally being an aps lens seems to do ok on ff. >Is there anything even better, preferably not too expensive?
Just being a fly in your ointment for a minute - why would you consider a lens of such sweeping focal length? Surely with the K1 having such a good sensor, using what can only ever be an inferior lens (with such a large zoom range) is counter-productive? -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) | Web Video Production ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
