The K-3II either has a different sensor or slightly different sensor
masking, as it has a slightly higher pixel count. Not enough to, by
itself, make a "real world" difference in image quality, but it's not
exactly the same. Just very close in pretty much every respect.
On 1/9/2017 10:49 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
The K-3 II has pixel shift, better SR (1 stop better), and the astro
tracer built in. It also lacks a pop up flash since that is where they
put the GPS unit. Otherwise they are 100% the same really. If you
didn't need pixel shift or GPS I would just pass myself.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Collin B <coll...@brendemuehl.net> wrote:
What's the advantages of a K3II over a K3?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
