I don't think Ricoh mistakes the Df for a sales leader either.
But, if you compare the "style" of the KP in relation to the rest of the
Pentax line of DSLRs and then compare the "style" of the Df in relation
to the rest of Nikon's line-up, I think there are some similarities.
On 1/26/2017 12:32 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I don't think so, the only thing retro about the KP is the shape of the
"pentaprism" housing, and that's not particularly retro based on
physics. I doubt even Ricoh, (ex Pentax), marketing could mistake the
Nikon Df as a top sales leader.
On 1/26/2017 11:38 AM, John wrote:
On 1/25/2017 8:18 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
There is no meaningful size difference between a KP and K-5.
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,187
Ditto the KP and K-3 just in case anyone cared...
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,485
I think this may be the more meaningful comparison:
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,495
The KP seems to have that same retro look.
Comment on DPReview, "Looks like a mini-Pentax 67 (LOL)"
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
