blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Igor,Thanks, now that you mention it I thought the focus point
was on the trunk, but it's not looking all that sharp to me. I'll have to run
the lens through some tests to check it, but I did pick it up for a song so
expectations aren't that high.
JayTÂ
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, 7:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org> wrote:
Jay,
When I looked at the photo, "wow!", I was impressed with the colors and
the composition.
But then I realized that something was bothering my eyes.
At first I thought that the photo was oversharpened. But when I looked
closely, I realized that the tree flowers are not sharp.
Actually, I am having hard time finding where the focus is. Either it is
back-focused, or you have a motion blur... (or something is out of whack
with the lens).
There is also a possibility that it is overcompressed with JPEG
processing.
Igor
On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor wrote:
>
> A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local historical camera
> collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 28/3.5. I
> wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 28/2.8
> and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and was
> pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one of
> the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
> JayT
>
https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
