Well, OK the K3ii has a thing for mikes. I'd try using a single point
sensor or, at least, one with fewer sensor points.
J
Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 10, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Jack Davis wrote:
>> Hi, Larry. In what way is the K1
>> focusing better or faster than the
>> K3ii?  Thanks!
> 
> The biggest way for me is that it doesn't obsesses over microphones the way 
> the K-3 does. For example only a few of my musician photos from last weekend 
> have the microphone rather than the singer in focus. I don't have any 
> quantitative data other than that, but my gut feeling is that it does seem to 
> be a bit faster, a bit more accurate, and most importantly a bit more precise 
> in following the selected focus point.
> 
> When I'm using the long lenses, particularly outdoors, I still use the K-3ii 
> because I'll crop anyways, it gives more dpi on the sensor, and in good light 
> the sensor quality differences are barely noticable.
> 
>> 
>> J
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Oct 10, 2017, at 1:39 PM, Larry Colen<l...@red4est.com>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> In many many ways the K-1 is an amazing camera. If all I did was portraits, 
>>> landscapes and still lifes it would be damn near unbeatable, especially for 
>>> the price.
>>> 
>>> However, for action photography, it can really suck donkey balls. The 
>>> focusing is a huge improvement over the K-3ii, but the focus points don't 
>>> cover nearly enough of the screen, especially if you want to place critical 
>>> compositional elements at the "third points". Despite the improvements over 
>>> the K-3, focus speed is still way too slow, especially compared to when 
>>> I've shot a friend's Nikon 810.
>>> 
>>> My biggest gripe is the bus speed.  Did they really think that people would 
>>> buy a full frame camera and always shoot JPEGs? I was photographing dance 
>>> competitions this weekend. Things happen fast, unpredictably, and often in 
>>> rapid succession, particularly when there is more than one couple dancing 
>>> at a time. After about a minute or two the buffer will fill up, and then 
>>> take something like five minutes to empty.  Once it fills up, it takes 
>>> something like 30 seconds before it's ready to shoot again, and I have no 
>>> idea of whether there's room in the buffer or not. I just have to press the 
>>> shutter and wonder whether it's not locking focus, or just still emptying 
>>> the buffer.
>>> 
>>> Gah! Every time I try to shoot action, I'm tempted to switch to Nikon. 
>>> Unfortunately, there's about 15,000 reasons why I can't.
>>> --
>>> Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to