Hi, Pat, Well, I think it's interesting, anyway! <g> And, apparently, so do you.
Other than my (our) TOPDML buddies, I'm the only person I know who owns and uses Pentax gear. Not that I know that many photographers (I use the term loosely when referring to me!), but those that I know own C****, N**** or Minolta. You see quite a few K1000's locally, especially during the school year - obviously Ryerson photograpy students. It was heartwarming to go to the zoo last weekend with the kids, and see a coupla older Pentaxes: an ME and an ME Super. I went to talk to both of them (the owners, not the cameras), but neither seemed too eager to discuss their cameras ("who's this weird man coming up to me, and why does he want to talk about my camera?"). >From what I see on this list, Pentaxes seem to be pushed at the camera stores here in >Canada a bit more than in the US, Henry's having a huge Pentax sign out front, the >same size as the other "big two's" signs. But in the media, it's another thing all together. So, when I see a Pentax being used by a pro (or amateur for that matter) it's a matter of great excitement. It's almost as if we're using a "cult" or (as you said) underground product or something! I guess it's up to us to keep the brand alive, as Pentax sometimes seems to be less than willing to do so... regards, frank Pat White wrote: > Frank, Pentax sightings are of interest. With Pentax full-page ads being so rare at >the moment, and their limited advertising generally (I think Leica has more ads), >Pentax is almost an "underground" brand nowadays. Luckily, they have 'true >believers' like the PDML and the AOHC. > -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .