> On 20 December 2017 at 15:01 Godfrey DiGiorgi <godfreydigio...@me.com> wrote:
> It makes no sense to me to have expectations that this camera is even a > finished product at this point in time. This reviewer has no patience for > working with in-development equipment. The Light L16 is a first product by a > new company, utilizing innovative new technology. Neither the camera's > firmware nor the processing app are even "release 1.0" yet—they're both beta > quality products at this time. Someone who doesn't understand what that means > and whines, moans, and gives up because it doesn't meet their expectations … > just dumb. > > This stupidity is probably brought on by modern notion that what is said in > advertising and promotional tripe should be accepted as absolute gospel and > you should set your expectations on that. "Of course it's true, I read it on > the internet." Blech and fooey—what utter nonsense. Reviews like this are > anything but definitive, why should I be bothered by them, or bothered to read > them at all? I do read them, trying to find any tiny nugget of information > about the item being studied that I missed, but most of the time they're just > hot air and whining. Not really fair, that. As a development engineer, you have a completely different viewpoint on products to a normal consumer. I wonder if you would be so sanguine if your Bladerunner flying car was always having near misses? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
