Not just "like" a revolution, it WAS a revolution; although I think you're
getting the cart before the horse. The revolution led to the breakup of AT&T
rather than vice versa.
Plus, there's a big difference in being a monopoly in an essential service and
having a monopoly on a luxury product.
On 5/23/2018 22:36, Gonz wrote:
Thats for sure. When AT&T was a monopoly, there was no innovation.
The princess phone was their "innovation" Once they got broken up, it
was like a revolution.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:18 AM, William Robb
<anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote:
Their strategy appears to aim to be the last man standing. I'm not sure how
good it would be for the industry to only have one or two choices.
Monopolies or near monopolies are never a good thing.
bill
On Tue, May 22, 2018, 11:39 PM Gonz, <rgonzoma...@gmail.com> wrote:
That is A LOT of money. It can only be good for the industry, the
resulting tech war should bring some interesting new products.
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 5/22/2018 9:17 PM, Gonz wrote:
Wow, this is crazy... Sounds more than just throwing to see what
sticks... I guess time will tell.
https://petapixel.com/2018/05/22/sony-investing-9b-in-image-sensors-aims-to-be-top-camera-brand-by-2021/
They have a lot of money. It will be interesting to see if they can make
it
stick to something.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
