Gonna need a bigger screen ;-) Thanks mate I will ponder on that and might adjust it accordingly.
On 11/9/18, Igor PDML-StR, discombobulated, unleashed: > >1600 x 1200 is too large. >Even on the screen where I have 1920x1200 resolution, it is very seldom >that I have the browser window open to the full screen, as I usually do >many things in parallel on my computer. >My laptop has even smaller screen resolution. So, your 1600 pixels do not >fit in the browser window (and laptop's screen). >Instead of the photo being aligned on the left side, there is a huge empty >margin on the left. > >Actually, the image itself is 800x800px. So, having that table 1600 px >wide is rather strange. > >Here is how your page looks in my browser: >http://42graphy.org/cotty/SC-page.jpg > > >Overall, my personal opinion is that a photo should be easily visible on >the screen of the targeted audience without scrolling (either vertical or >horizontal). > >A lot of people around me are using laptops. Until recently, most laptops >were with XGA screens (1024x768), and then some with the "wide-screen" >aspect 1280x720 or 1280x800. >So, I was trying to keep the photos within 900x600 px, to allow for the >browser frame, headers, etc. >Gradually (and especially since many laptop screens are now 1366x768 or >higher), I've relaxed those to 700x700 for the square format. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ UK Shoot / Edit and || (O) | Live Broadcast News ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
