Not B&W. The moon turned out naturally monochrome because I didn't catch any of
the red in the earth's shadow.
Each of the moon images is loaded as a layer in Photoshop.
Each layer has a linked Levels adjustment layer, masked so that the Levels
adjustment only applies to the moon in that layer. That gives me the visible
portion of the moon at approximately the same brightness for each image.
It was the best I could do because none moon images has any shadow detail I
could bring out.
Thanks to you, Bob & Igor for looking.
On 1/22/2019 14:48:36, Jack Davis wrote:
Nice! Looks to be a B&W.(?)
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2019, at 11:27 AM, Bob W-PDML <p...@web-options.com> wrote:
Very nicely done!
On 22 Jan 2019, at 16:53, John <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
So, I went out and stood in what felt like an Arctic Wind for 3 hours or
so and took pictures of the moon. As usual, the instructions for how to
do it right were at home on my desk waiting so I could find out
everything I did wrong.
Still, I didn't muff it as badly as I did the Solar Eclipse in 2017.
https://flic.kr/p/2ehuNSE
K-1, Tokina AT-X Pro 80-200mm f/2.8 @ 200mm & F/16, ISO 100, various
wrong shutter speeds so I didn't catch much of the red tint.
I was in town when I took these, right next to the parking lot for a city
park. Raleigh, Cary & Wake County have been installing new LED street
lights that don't cause as much light pollution as the old lighting.
I've noticed it a couple of times in the last year or so, driving back to
Raleigh on the Interstate late some night when it's overcast there's less
of a bubble of light over the city.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
